Most of these two despatches refer to the matter referred for the consideration of the Law Officers, who have stated that on sanitary grounds there would be no objection to the protection of the building for which it is proposed.
If correct, & as his Lordship has suggested, the site at the West corner of the Parade ground, which was proposed in 1862 (but it has not been abandoned), should revert to the charge of the Ordnance Department.
Page 361
I have therefore recommended to you my sanction for the erection of the City Hall as recommended by Mr. Mercer, & upon the distinct understanding, however, that the alterations in the Station Master's Office, & the deviation of the Road which will be necessitated, do not entail any charge on the Public Revenue.
M
of these two despaliter to Le nferred for the
consideration Practiseg
who has stated that
B
Sanitary grounds
there would
h
4o
tection & the building
Which it is for powerd
I rrect, & his Lordsliche
sneet
Fat th
has suggested site at the West corner
The Parade ground
panted
which was
frother Jompose in 1862 (but it has no been abandoned)
should revert li
the charge other
Nor Dept.
361
Thave themfore Ecoring
& you my
Sanction
of
the Erection of the City
Hall
ar
ncommended
ярок
by In Mercer, & apron
the distinct understanding
however
Stat the atterations
in the starton Martins
Inc, & the deviation
of the Road which will
h
recessitated, do not
Entail
any charger
on the Public Revenue.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.